What Could Be Worse (than Coronavirus)?

This year has been pretty frustrating, all around - there has been so much death, disappointment, disgust, fragility, pain & suffering - and as well as all that, we also have the coronavirus plague. But, let's look on the bright side, it could be worse...
I can already hear you: "But, Absurd Word Nerd, what could be worse than Earthquakes, Ebola, Economic Crashes, Explosions, Fascists, Fire, Hong Kong Persecution, Human Rights Violations, Ignorance, Impeachment, Locusts, Murder, Neo-Nazis, Protests and Trump?"
And wow, you really have been keeping track of the news, it would probably take me an hour of research to memorize all of that, so well done you. But, rest assured that whilst, yes, we do have... all of that, at least COVID-19 isn't as bad as it could be. Yes, I know, it's absolutely devastating, and at time of writing it's killed over over a million people and rising, and even those who survive can suffer from long term affects, which at best may be some post-traumatic stress, but at worst could be long-term physiological effects including damage to the lungs, kidneys, heart and/or brain.
Sure, all of that definitely sucks, but see, there are actually worse diseases out there, which you and I could get right now. Okay, maybe not "right now", since some of them you need to go outside for - but there are real diseases, and you can get them, and yes they are worse than coronavirus. So, don't you see, it's not so bad? It could be so much worse.

Y'know what, you don't seem convinced, so let explain this in detail. I just did a little bit of research, and I found eight diseases which are way worse than coronavirus, which you could have, but don't... actually, you might now that I think about it, since some of these are horrifyingly common - BUT! I can guarantee that you definitely don't have all of them, because most of them are very deadly, so even if you do have one of these (and genuinely, I am sorry, I hope your family is at peace), just cross that one off the list and begin with these:

Dishonourable Mentions

i. Fatal Insomnia
What is that, exactly? This is a prion disease, caused by a mutation of gene-encoding proteins in the brain which causes a reduction in glucose production by the thalamus, and a mild hypo-metabolism of the cingulate cortex. As the thalamus is a part of the brain important in regulating sleep, these imbalances cause an inability to sleep.
And how is that worse? Well, this diseases takes away your ability to sleep, at all, and you kind of need to sleep. What research I've been able to do says that symptoms come in four stages. In stage one, which lasts for about four months, symptoms include bouts of insomnia that worsens over these months, which causes panic attacks, paranoia and agitation. In stage two, which lasts five months, insomnia worsens, panic attacks become more frequent, and the patient begins experiencing hallucinations. In stage three, which lasts just three months, the patient will become chronically insomniacal, unable to sleep at all, which causes hypnagogia, and is followed by rapid weight loss. In stage four, the final stage, the patient suffers from dementia, and in the last six months may become unresponsive or mute, catatonic or with involuntary muscle movements until their inevitable death.
Can I really get this? Technically, yes... but, it's not likely. This is a rare disease, which has two types. The most common familial fatal insomnia (fFI) is passed down genetically, and there are 40 families which have been known to share this gene, in the entire world. However, the second kind, sporadic fatal insomnia (sFI), appears to be caused by a random mutation of the same proteins, and there have only been 24 people (that's single persons, not whole families) recorded as catching this disease in medical history. So, yeah, you can get it, but it's not likely, which is why this doesn't make the list proper.

ii. Alzheimer's Disease
What is that, exactly? This is a neurodegenerative disease which is believed to be caused by abnormal amounts of amyloids and other proteins in the brain to encroach upon otherwise healthy brain cells. These protein deposits, known as "neuritic plaque" inhibit the normal function and chemistry of the brain, which causes a neurotransmitter deficit, inevitably resulting in a progressive loss of brain function.
And how is that worse? You need your brain to remember, to think, to feel, to choose - this disease takes that away from you, very slowly. Culturally, people think of Alzheimer's as Chronic Senile Forgetfulness, but it's so much more than that. People with Alzheimer's disease can live for approximately 3-9 years before their brain function is inhibited to the point that they cannot take care of themselves, feed themselves, speak, move or even think with any kind of coherency. Technically, Alzheimer's itself doesn't kill, however patients become much more vulnerable to accidents, choking, dehydration, infection, malnutrition & stroke. The disease itself doesn't kill you, but in a way it does kill you, by taking away everything of who you are until you're little more than a shadow of your former self. Even though this is a long-lasting illness, to me the very first symptom, memory loss, is already a horrifying thought, but add onto that the fact that you lose motor function, sensory perception, speech & self-awareness, and it sounds like a waking nightmare. And of course, there is no cure, because we don't even understand what causes this in the first place, There may be genetic factors, but they aren't the only cause, leading some researchers to propose all kinds of causes and risk factors from head injury and mental illness to poor diet and exercise.
Can I really get this? Definitely, and your chance of suffering through this disease goes up significantly with age. Early-Onset Alzheimer's is not unheard of, but it is uncommon, with just one in every forty-thousand people under the age of 65-years who have it. However, one in ten 65-year-olds have it; and, one in three 85-year-olds have it. The only reason this doesn't make the list is because, although more research needs to be done, there's little to no reason to believe that Alzheimer's is an infectious disease.

iii. Vibrio Vulnificus Infection
What is that, exactly? Vibrio vulnificus is a species of curved, rod-shaped, pathogenic bacteria, whose natural habitat is brackish or salt-water. The most common cause of infection is ingestion of infected seafood, and V. vulnificus is responsible for 95% of seafood-related death, killing 16 people every year. This bacterium releases defensive toxins which can cause shock syndromes and bacterial dissemination which leads to sepsis, and death due to organ failure, or blood infection.
And how is that worse? Whilst it is most commonly caused by ingestion, which is pretty horrific, causing abdominal pain, diarrhea & vomiting. However, what makes this bacterium so horrifying, to me, is that it doesn't need to get into your stomach. If you just have a little cut, or a little scratch on your skin, this begins as redness, pain and swelling around the site of the infection as well as a fever, but in as little as three days it progresses into  either dermatitis, cellulitis or sepsis, but rapidly progresses to a necrotic infection in your skin with rapid and severe tissue destruction. That means it starts killing and rotting away your skin from the inside. it's most dangerous for those with a compromised immune system, or with a weakened liver.
Can I really get this? Yes, but it's not likely to hurt you. Whilst this does naturally occur in ocean water (meaning, yes, you can get this if you go to the beach), it has a low chance of harming you. To begin with, this one is sexist... 85% of victims are male, as oestrogen has a protective effect against the bacteria; so, half the population has a natural protection from it. Also, even if you eat raw, ocean seafood such as oysters (which I don't recommend), stomach acid is usually strong enough to kill this bacterium, that's one of the reasons we have stomach acid, after all. And of course, whilst this can cause horrifying infections if it gets in a wound, even a small cut, most people avoid swimming at the beach even with small cuts because ocean water is very, very salty, and that tends to hurt like all hell. For a long while, this was on the list proper since a flesh-eating bacteria that you cn get at the beach sounds pretty scary; but as it says above, only sixteen people a year die from this, and the infection has so many things holding it back, I couldn't justify it over the much more deadly diseases on offer.

I felt it necessary to include these horrible diseases because, although they didn't make the list due to mortality, rarity and cause, I wanted to show you just how horrible even non-infectious, non-deadly diseases can be. But, without further ado, let's continue with the proper list of...

THE A.W.N.'s TOP 5 INFECTIOUS DISEASES (SOMEHOW) WORSE THAN COVID-19

5. Naegleriasis
What is that, exactly? Also known as Primary Amoebic Meningoencephalitis (or PAM), Naegleriasis is caused by an infection by Naegleria fowleri, a unicellular eukaryote which thrives in warm water, which has three stages. Without adequate food or heat N. fowleri enters a cystic stage, where it shrinks to a  spherical shape with a protective membrane. In the flagellate stage, the N. fowleri grows two flagella to allow it to swim easily through water and spread throughout the environment. In the trophozoite stage, N. fowleri cells grow pseudopodia to navigate, and in warm temperatures can procreate through fission, and feed on bacteria, as well as other organic matter.
And how is that worse? Naegleria fowleri is more commonly known by the colloquial name "brain-eating amoeba"; but that name is a little misleading - it's not actually an amoeba, it's really a shapeshifting amoeboflagellate excavate. However, yes, it does eat brains. In its flagellate form, this critter spreads throughout warm water, but if it enters your nose, within a few hours, it can transform into its trophozoite stage where it attaches to your olfactory epithelium and uses its pseudopodia to traverse your nasal cavity and up into your brain. It is believed that it does this because your brain is, on average, kept at 40°C, which is the optimal temperature for procreation, and provides plenty to feed on. Once this reaches the brain, patients suffer from confusion, fever, hallucinations, headache, nausea, seizures, stiff neck & vomiting. Symptoms worsen quickly in as little as five days, and leads to death at most two weeks later. There are no known cures, and of the over 450 cases of naegleriasis on record, only seven people have ever survived infection.
Can I really get this? Unfortunately, yes. This microorganism is typically found in bodies of warm, fresh water; these include hot springs, ponds, lakes, rivers, and (damp) soil, but can include geothermal well water; warm water discharge from power plants; water heaters & dirty or minimally chlorinated swimming pools or spas. However, it must be said that this is very rare, and less rare in subtropical parts of the word. Although over 400 people are on record as contracting naegleriasis, that's over a period of 60 years of recorded medicine, globally, which basic maths tells us is an average of 7~ people a year, which is why it is so low on this list. It is, however, a devastating illness I'd wish on no one that kills quickly, horribly and painfully... just make sure your water is cold and clean, especially if it goes anywhere near your nose.

4. Influenza
What is that, exactly? Influenza, also known as "the flu" is an infectious disease caused by three or four genera of the Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses, namely Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma- & Deltainfluenzavirus. (although Deltainfluenzavirus hasn't yet been known to affect humans). An influenza virion is pleomorphic, which means it can alter its morphology based on the environment, but it is generally ellipsoidal with particles 80-120 nanometres in diameter, with a viral envelope composed of a lipid bilayer, covered with glycoprotein spikes. This means it has great potency to invade and infect host cells, especially lung cells, and to procreate within and spread throughout the host body.
And how is that worse? Originally, I wanted to include Swine Flu or perhaps even Spanish Flu, but neither of them seemed virulent or deadly enough... that was, until I did some research and discovered that they're the same disease - "Influenza A virus subtype H1N1" That's right, the same virus responsible for the Spanish Flu pandemic in 1918 had a resurgence in 2009. Although they're caused by different subtype, it's also responsible for the Hong Kong Flu pandemic in 1968, the Asian Flu pandemic in 1957 and the Russian Flu pandemic in 1889. Influenza Pandemics are common, as the Seasonal Flu is endemic among several species, giving the virus ample opportunity to replicate and mutate, evolving into more virulent and deadly strains.
Can I really get this? Not only can you get this, you probably already have had it several times, which is the only reason it's not higher on this list. Flu does have a a significant death toll, but that's mostly due to its spread - and those aged 65+ years old account for 80% of deaths due to influenza. I'm not dismissing those losses, but even including those, less than 0.5% of people who get the flu will die. The reason why I include is because whilst it's general numbers are low, it is responsible for several deadly outbreaks and pandemics, and currently researchers are keeping a close eye on Avian flu, as it has a high risk of human transmission, and without close scrutiny could result in another influenza pandemic in the near future. So, whilst it's not currently a high-mortality disease, it has every potential to become one, again, in the future.

3. Cholera
What is that, exactly? Vibrio cholerae is a species of curved, comma-shaped, pathogenic bacteria, whose natural habitat is brackish or salt-water. The most common cause of infection is ingestion of infected seafood, although V. cholerae also spreads through unclean water, and kills ~75,000 people every year. This bacterium releases endotoxin & exotoxin which causes profuse, watery diarrhea and bacterial dissemination which leads to colonization of the small intestine, and death due to organ failure, or dehydration... if any of that sounds familiar, it's because this bacteria is related to Vibrio vulnificus, they're from the same family and genus, but this one is much more deadly...

And how is that worse? Without water, you will die very quickly. Always keep in mind the "Rule of 3 for Survival", for how long you can survive without life essentials? Air, 3 Minutes; Shelter, 3 Hours; Water, 3 Days & Food, 3 Weeks.
This virus causes severe, watery diarrhea which is not only quite gross, but it often means you lose water faster than your body can process it. So, even though this infection typically only lasts for a few days, that's more than enough time to kill you. For this reason, this disease is most deadly among young children, as they can lose enough water to become dehydrated very quickly. Oral rehydration with liquids high in electrolytes is recommended, as well as continuing to eat and keep up calorie and vitamin intake; but in more extreme cases, antibiotics and intravenous fluids are necessary to prevent people from dying of extreme starvation which leads to headaches, confusion, delirium & seizure.
Can I really get this? Yes, but unless you live somewhere without easy access to clean drinking water and/or healthcare, you are less likely to both contract this disease and die from it. This adversely affects those in poor or rural communities, with a 50% chance of death, however even in regions with cleaner water, sanitation and adequate healthcare, mortality still sits as high as 15%; mostly children and the elderly, but also the immune compromised, or those with sudden and severe infections. That's the craziest thing about Cholera to me, I look at it like Smallpox or Rickets, old-timey diseases that we don't have to worry about anymore thanks to modern medicine. However, this disease never went away, it's just mostly prevalent in Africa, Asia & South America.

2. HIV/AIDS
What is that, exactly? HIV-1 or human immunodeficiency virus 1 refers to a species of Lentivirus, a kind of retrovirus which severely hinders the immune system. It does this by infecting several elements of the immune system - CD4 T Cells, which release cytokines to alert other elements of the immune system; macrophages, a kind of white blood cell that consumes invasive cells & dendritic cells which capture antigens and use them to activate elements of the adaptive immune system. AIDS is a complication of HIV where the immune system is severely compromised.
And how is that worse? Your immune system prevents you from getting sick by constantly removing, destroying and fighting off foreign matter that gets into your body. You need to breathe, drink and eat to survive, so it's important that you can fight off any of the nasties that can hijack their way into your body on a pretty much daily basis. For this reason, people with AIDS often suffer from opportunistic infections caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites, causing prolonged fever, a persistent cough & weakness. Some of the most common symptoms of AIDS are cachexia (also known as HIV wasting syndrome), diarrhea & unintended weight loss. Left untreated, someone with AIDS has a life expectancy of around 10 years.

Can I really get this? If you have unprotected sex, then yes. Whilst it may seem simple enough to just "avoid having sex with HIV-positive partners", the problem is the way acute HIV affects you. Two-to-three weeks after initial exposure, the patient may suffer from nonspecific fever-like symptoms, but many have no symptoms at all. The second stage of HIV, called 'clinical latency', is a stage that can last for three to twenty years when the patient shows no symptoms at all, but can still pass the disease through unprotected sex or exposure to infected blood. The third stage is AIDS itself, which lasts until the patient dies from one of those opportunistic infections, most often as a result of organ failure. Although data is limited, according to my research, the leading cause of death amongst those with HIV appears to be pneumonia, suicide & tuberculosis.

1. Rabies
What is that, exactly? Rabies is a disease caused by infections by the Rhabdoviridae Lyssaviruses. Rabies viruses is transmissible through saliva.

Trimeric spikes of the virus exterior membrane interact with cell receptors, of a host's muscle or nerve cells, pinching the host cell via pinocytosis and essentially merging with the cell wall, releasing its RNA genome via five proteins: nucleoprotein, phosphoprotein, matrix protein, glycoprotein & polymerase. These proteins interact with the low pH within the endosome, activating the RNA replication and allowing the virus to reproduce within the new cell. This allows the virus to propagate and spread copies of itself through the host's nervous system. Within the nervous system, rabies is capable of affecting behaviour to make its host more aggressive and causing inflammation of the brain.

And how is that worse? Because it's slow, painful, incurable and very, very deadly - of those who have contracted rabies, 97% of symptomatic patients do not survive. Rabies is most commonly spread via a bite from a rabid animal. After initial infection, the first stage is an incubation period which is often one to three months, but there have been cases of the incubation period being as short as four days, or as long as six years, usually due to the location of the infection, the severity of the wound and the patient's health prior to infection. The second stage is the symptomatic stage, and patients may have nonspecific flu-like symptoms such as fever and headache. This progresses to severe symptoms of viral encephalitis and meningitis, and often includes abnormal behaviour, agitation, anxiety, confusion, hallucinations, insomnia, paranoia, partial paralysis, terror & in several cases an irrational fear of water leading to severe dehydration and frothing at the mouth. Two to ten days after first symptoms appear, the disease will progress to delirium, coma and inevitably death.

Can I really get this? Yes. There are several lyssaviruses that cause rabies, at least seven genotypes identified so far, most of which are endemic to bats but can spread to humans if they are bitten, or ingest/inhale aspirated bat saliva, urine or feces. Not only are bat species found in every country (except Antarctica and those in the Arctic circle), but rabies lyssavirus has been shown to be evolving, such that it can now infect raccoons and skunks, giving it greater transmissibility among mammalian carnivores... such as dogs and cats. There are treatments for rabies, but they are preventative. Pest control and vaccination are the most effective methods, as after infection there is only a ten-day window where vaccine treatment after exposure is effective - but since early symptoms are non-specific, many tests are inconclusive or unreliable, and some later symptoms can be confused for irritability and other viral infections, it makes it much harder to diagnose and treat rabid patients within that timeframe.

So, you see? COVID-19 doesn't seem so bad now, does it? At least you don't have these diseases [unless you do, of course], so hey, it could be worse...
Of course, that begs the question of what exactly I mean by "worse". I chose these because the symptoms are painful or scary, the diseases are deadly and they are highly infectious, meaning that you can get them. However, that being said, are these "worse" because they have a higher mortality rate? Are they "worse" because the symptoms are more painful? I mean, if you're asking which injury is worse, most people would say that getting shot in the foot with a shotgun is worse than getting stabbed in the foot with a pencil. But, which is worse, the pain from a pencil that is currently stabbed through your bleeding foot, or having a shotgun pointed at you, threateningly? How can anything be worse than something you're currently dealing with.
Sure, these diseases exist, most of them have existed for all of your life (whilst the current COVID-19 pandemic only mutated into existence recently) but the coronavirus is the disease that's currently threatening most people's lives, at time of writing. Of course, that's also assuming that you don't currently suffer from asthma; or bipolar; or cancer; or diabetes; or epilepsy; or fibromyalgia or any of the hundreds of other diseases, disabilities and afflictions out there that can make life harder than that of the average, healthy person.

It makes you think... or, at least, it makes me think, because I wrote this all tongue-in-cheek, but looking back at it, whilst I do think it would be worse to suffer from a disease that eats your brain; spreads worldwide; dehydrates you through diarrhea; destroys your immune system or deletes your memories, that's only because I've never had coronavirus, and so to me this is an entirely intellectual exercise, like the one before: pencil vs. shotgun. But that's easier to say before they pull the trigger.

I'm the Absurd Word Nerd, and until next time, I'm going to go sharpen my pencil.

A Sick & Sad World

I was so glad to hear that people are finally seeing the world my way...
- "the world is sick, and people are dying from their ignorance of this unstoppable sickness" -
However, I was sadly mistaken...
For, it turns out, it wasn't the sickness that I'm seeing, of hope, joy and fearlessness. No no, it was a literal, viral sickness that infects the lungs, and kills the elderly.
Whilst, for my Halloween Countdown, I thrive on death and suffering, even I must admit that there's less fun to be had when these foolish mortals are dropping so easily. Where's the fun in that? Where's the challenge in that? It's like shooting fish in a barrel. Whilst that may sound appealing, take my word for it, after just a few shotgun blasts all you'll have is a putrid barrel of red water and fish guts.

See, now there is a real sickness in this world - but I'm not going to let that spoil my fun - NOT today, of all days. Because, after all, today... is my Birthday:

Happy Birthday to You,
But Beware what you do...
Or, this might be the Last Time,
That we sing this to You...

Oh yes. That little piece of poetry is usually just a macabre reminder of the remainder of our mortality, but this year it's more true than most. Because if you don't beware what you do, dying is a significant risk.
Not necessarily death - but definitely Dying. The COVID-19 coronavirus kills through the death and dysfunction of your lung cells, which means that even if you become infected and survive, you will first have to spend at least two - but up to six - weeks, struggling to breathe, all the while coughing; with fever and fatigue.
Your lungs begin to die, and as they are dying if your body cannot heal those cells quick enough - or you can't find a respirator or medical assistance to help your weakened lungs to breathe until you can regain your strength -  then the rest of you will die as a result of oxygen deprivation. You suffocate to death.

It is for this reason that I have no pity for the worthless fools that promote the ridiculous hoax that this coronavirus is fake, or that the necessary steps to protect us (i.e. self-isolation, hand-washing & face masks) are not necessary. It is pure ignorance... unfortunately for me, I already spent last year's Halloween Countdown talking about such horrifying miseducation, so I cannot dwell on it for another 13 days. But, rest assured, these people are ignorant, and could do well to learn from my post about Skepticism 101.

But this year, I'm focusing on sickness. And not so much mental sicknesses (as that was the theme of 2015's Halloween Countdown two years before that), but rather physical ailment, and in particular bacterial, genetic and/or virological - often microscopic - agents that enter our bodies and wreak havoc on our immune systems, biological systems and, in a disturbing number of cases, results in our disfigurement or death. Doesn't that sound fun?

- well, it does to me, and it's my birthday, so if you don't like it go blow your nose.

But, if you do like it, or are interested to see what I have to say, please stick around. In the middle of this plague, it's not like there's a whole lot to do outside, so why not sit at home and enjoy your Halloween Countdown with me. Who knows, maybe you'll catch something while you're here...

I'm the Absurd Word Nerd, until next time I hope you stay happy and healthy out there. There's enough dying going on out there in this sick, sad world; we don't want to have to add your corpse to the pile.

Outbreak Diary - Day 045

I have had my fair share of dealing with conspiracy theorists. And one of the first things that you need to comprehend is:

No matter how stupid their beliefs are, these are not inherently stupid people.

This is vital to understand for two important reasons.
Firstly, if you dismiss these people as idiots, then you will be putting yourself at risk of assuming that they are ineffectual or inoffensive, when in fact they are often just as dedicated, hard-working, creative and dangerous as any other person can be - conspiracy theories can be dangerous.
Secondly, it puts you at risk of assuming that you are not capable of falling victim to their "dumb" beliefs if you're just smart enough, but that's not the case at all, since these beliefs aren't based on intellect but emotion and common sense. So, if you have emotions, you can fall victim to conspiracy theories, if you're not careful - conspiracies theories can be convincing.

In a way, conspiracy theories are like a virus, they have developed to try to invade weaknesses in your defences. Just as coronavirus can infect you through the weak points of your immune system - it can't get through your skin, so it goes through openings, your eyes and mouth - conspiracy theories, similarly, can't get through your intellectual defences of reason and logic, so it goes through openings in your defences, your emotions and your opinions.
I go into detail about this viral meme model of thought in an earlier blog post, so I won't reiterate it here, but the point is simple - humans make mistakes, in the way we speak, act and think, and some of the most pernicious and deleterious ideas spread by taking advantage of our human weaknesses. Particularly emotions.

This matters because the COVID-19 epidemic is causing a lot of emotions for a lot of people: It kills people and causes harm, to both us and people we care about; it's caused isolation, which is devastating to a social species like human, making people feel alone, upset and frustrated & several people have lost jobs, or had their life ruined by the actions of politicians, or locals, making people feel angry, stressed and trapped.
So, it's no surprise at all that people are falling victim to conspiracy theories. But, there have been an awful lot that have been spread, specifically about coronavirus. I enjoy learning, and I think this is a good opportunity to learn more about why these people believe these things, as well as how to help people overcome these beliefs. And, I find mythbusting fun, so, let's look at some of these theories. I may not cover these all in one blog post, but I'll cover every one that I can.

"The 5G Virus"

The Theory is... that coronavirus is being caused by the upgraded telecommunication network, known as 5G; OR, that coronavirus doesn't exist at all, but rather people are actually falling victim to hazardous radio waves or electromagnetic fields from the new 5G telecommunication network. And to hide this fact, the government invented this "coronavirus", so they wouldn't be blamed for the effects. But why would the government lie about this? Well, it's simple... this way, they can trick people into being Vaccinated!

It's Convincing because... of two reasons. Firstly, I looked into the "Australians for Safer Technology", a group which perpetuates these beliefs, and people there seem to also believe in the anti-vaxxer movement - so in fact this conspiracy theory is a mutation of the "Vaccinations Cause Autism and/or allow Governments to Control the Population" theory. I will talk about vaccines later in this blog post, but if this all seems like a bitter pill to swallow, remember, these people have already drunk the Kool-Aid. All you need to do is believe that the Government doesn't always do what's best for you (and let's be honest, it doesn't) - and then it's easy to build upon that belief to get to anti-vax beliefs.
Secondly, it's convincing because of the close association again. The Coronavirus pandemic is spreading worldwide, at the same time as 5G is being installed worldwide; also, coronavirus spreads invisibly, seeming to hit people at random and no one is safe, just as 5G works via radio waves, which are invisible and literally everyone with a 5G phone can connect. All you need to do is introduce the concept that invisible radio waves can be harmful (and, yes, they can), and you can see why people might believe this...

The Reality is... the first theory is debunked very, very quickly. 5G towers don't create or spread viruses, and in several places where 5G does not exist, people are getting sick, so we can put that aside.
As to the other theory, that the radiation is making us sick, that's also easy to dispute. When radiation of any kind, including radiowaves, are harmful to organic matter, they can't "target" specific cells. Just look at UV radiation - it can cause skin cancer, and whilst skin cancer can metastasize and spread, if it ever does affect you, it has to affect the outer layer of your skin first. This also debunks the idea that this is causing our bodies to react and release toxins, since you would have to see it on people's skin. But sick, toxic or cancerous skin doesn't look like healthy skin, and since bumps, rashes, growths & skin discoloration aren't symptoms of COVID-19, we know that radiation isn't the cause.
The fact of the matter is that 5G isn't very different from 4G. The main difference (and what makes it so much faster) is that it uses a higher frequency of 1,000 megahertz, instead of the 100 megahertz of 4G, which is why it's much faster. But, because the frequency is higher, it means it can't spread as far, which is why they're putting up more towers, to allow 5G to cover more area. And whilst 5G is on the same EM spectrum as UV rays, X-rays and gamma radiation, do you know what else is on that spectrum? Visible light. Radio waves would have to become visible before they could be a high enough frequency to be dangerous.
Now, it is possible for even these radio waves to dangerous if they also have a low enough wavelength, to results in dielectric heating via microwaves. However, 5G doesn't use microwaves, because they're dangerous. Microwaves can cause burns but there's a much simpler reason why we know 5G doesn't use microwaves. Microwaves are non-ionizing and don't cause skin cancer or target lung cells, but do you know what body part is really vulnerable to microwaves?
       (WARNING, I find this interesting, but this is really gross)
Eyeballs. Microwaves can very easily denature proteins in your eyes, by literally cooking your eyes, causing severe cataracts and blindness. So, we know 5G isn't dangerous because: a) You can't see it and b) You can still see.

"The Chinese Biological Weapon"

The Theory is... that COVID-19 isn't a naturally evolved virus, a mutation of the SARS coronavirus, but instead a bio-engineered weapon, developed by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. According to the institute's own Wikipedia page, they were doing research on the SARS virus, to see if it they could infect humans with it. That's the smoking gun right there! And hey, doesn't the WIV's logo look suspiciously similar to the Umbrella Corporation - a fictional company from the Resident Evil games whose goal was to infect humanity with a deadly virus?

It's Convincing because... there a lot of associations, fickle though they be. But, the main reason appears to be that people find randomness hard to comprehend or hard to come to terms with. If 30 people stand in a room, and 15 people randomly die because of micrometeors, that's a tragedy; but if 30 people stand in a room, and 15 people die randomly because of a sniper, that's also a tragedy, but it's easier to come to terms with because we understand why it happened (i.e. an evil person is responsible, they chose to do it).
The scales of justice have tipped, because it was weighed down by "evil", and so we push it back the other way to balance it - we simply have to kill/capture/punish the sniper. But, when people die randomly, the scales of justice tip, but there's no way to push them back... because nothing actually weighed it down. That makes no sense to us...
So, this is why people blame China, because if China did it, then to make the world fair, balanced and right again, all we have to do is punish China. Unfortunately, people who honestly believe this have been attacking random, local Chinese people - it's disgusting, bigoted and wrong, but it makes sense when you follow the flawed logic to its conclusion.

The Reality is... the Wuhan Institute of Virology was trying to understand the last SARS epidemic, and was trying to understand if humans were at risk of the non-human SARS virus, that's found in horseshoe bats in China. The virus they were looking at was different from the current one (although also found in bats, the pangolin/bat strain that appears to have mutated into novel-SARS-coronavirus-2 has a different genetic make-up). Considering the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic exists, it's good that places like the WIV were trying to see if it was possible, and could be prevented. Unfortunately, this lab doesn't have the ability to engineer a virus like the novel coronavirus, because as much as they were researching transmissibility, they couldn't have engineered the old virus to alter its gestation, virulence and transmission. That kind of bio-engineering is beyond a lab with their resources, but natural selection could allow for a virus to develop randomly with relative ease. If you understand how genetics work, it's the only explanation that makes sense.
Also, as a side-note, the Wuhan lab's logo looks nothing like the Umbrella logo - the picture people have shared is actually a picture of the logo if a biotech company from Shanghai, not Wuhan, and the company in question, doesn't operate anymore - that picture is several years old.

"The Total Hoax Proposal"

The Theory is... that COVID-19 does not exist, at all. News stories regarding the virus are fake, all of the statistics for infection and death are made up; or it's just exaggerating some commonplace epidemic, such as the common cold. All scientists or politicians presenting these coronavirus claims as fact are either paid disinformationists, lying for personal gain or they are falling victim to these lies. The truth is that nobody is sick from this coronavirus at all, and all of the social distancing and isolation rules are just to take away people's freedoms, and keep people controlled, using fear.

It's Convincing because... well, do you know anyone with coronavirus? Personally, I do, and based on the death toll I know many must, but several people don't. For them, it's easy to say that they can't see this virus near them, despite how "deadly" it's supposed to be, so why would they believe it? After all, if were so deadly, shouldn't they be able to see it in their backyard? Heck, even if someone does get sick that they know, it's easier to assume that it's not some new virus, but just a very bad flu.
But, what really motivates these people is either fear of losing control - if you lose your job and have to stay home and can't meet your friends, you are essentially surrendering your freedom and losing control of your life; OR, it's a kind of weaponized bewilderment. Because they're unable to understand how this is possible, they simply don't accept that it is.
I am a skeptic, so I can understand the desire to doubt something purported as true despite how widely-held such claims may be, but there is a difference between doubting the veracity of a claim that we all hold to be true, and outright denying it with the counter-claim that it is not true, and the person proposing it is a liar.

The Reality is... that the coronavirus pandemic does exist, and that COVID-19 is currently infecting billions and killing hundreds of thousands (at time of writing). And whilst it is true that we all need to be wary of how much power the government has over us, the fact is that social distancing is the most effective method of stopping this virus, and as a result we need to surrender some of the basic freedoms such as freedom of movement & freedom of association, for the sake of everyone who is vulnerable to this virus. It's a sad fact that all forms of security takes with them a degree of freedom and convenience, and when people protest these en masse, in the midst of a viral pandemic, they're just putting themselves and others needlessly in mortal danger.

"The U.S. Biological Weapon"

The Theory is... that COVID-19 isn't a naturally evolved virus, a mutation of the SARS coronavirus, but instead a bio-engineered weapon, developed by the C.I.A., which was smuggled into Wuhan, China and released there, so as to harm China's economy, and tarnish China's reputation, making it appear disease-ridden, dirty and underdeveloped.

It's Convincing because... the C.I.A. is a secretive agency, and it has been involved in its fair share of controversies and America has been known to try to step in and affect world politics. So, spreading a virus specifically to harm another country doesn't seem too far outside of their scope.
Plus, from the very beginning President Trump, the WALRUS, has been blaming China, calling COVID-19 the Chinese Flu, and wanting to specifically ban travel to and from China. This also relates back to what I said above with the Chinese bio-weapon theory, but note, the claims blaming China tend to come from the West, whereas these claims blaming the U.S. seem to come from Europe and the East - it's all about scapegoating, passing the buck, and finding someone to blame for this, so long as that someone isn't yourself. And it becomes the worst in times like this when there isn't someone to blame for the outbreak - because it means you can't relieve that built up tension.

The Reality is... America has been the worst affected by this virus. At time of writing, America has had over one million persons affected, and over seventy-thousand dead (more than the next two worst-affected countries, combined). The reason for this is because America is a perfect storm for this kind of virus - it has a whole lot of people, densely populated, with freedom to move around, and with an economy that allows people to travel interstate and internationally with ease. It also hasn't suffered from a great many pandemics as some countries in Asia have been, so it was completely blindsided by this virus. Also, America had been cutting back on funding for departments regarding infectious diseases since this new government took office, and unfortunately there has been a fair amount of  mismanagement on the part of President Trump and his staff regarding protocol, government oversight and misinformation, which allowed this virus to spread through America as far as it has. The point is, if the C.I.A. had manufactured this virus, then why would it not have greater security in place to protect it from a virus that it manufactured? That doesn't make any sense. If the goal was to denigrate China as disease-ridden, then why would it allow itself to become infected, and allow it to be so much worse on American soil than any other country?
Just as damning, the same evidence that proves China didn't manufacture this virus also refutes America, or in fact anyone from manufacturing this virus. Not only does evidence that it was engineered just not exist, but several studies have shown how this is a natural mutation, evolved from a SARS coronavirus.


Those seem to be the most prominent of conspiracy theories... at least, they're the ones with any meat on their bones. There are a couple of other ridiculous claims like "the Jews did it" and "eating oregano will cure you" which, whilst some people believe them, the only reason people believe them are due to other pre-existing beliefs, and the only response to them is "well, that's just not true.
I might cover them in a later blog post, but for now, I hope this has helped you to learn a little more about the mistakes people make in their reasoning, and how to try to avoid making them yourself. This took a stupidly-long amount of time for me to write, so I apologize for the long wait, but hopefully what I have to talk about in the future won't take so long.

Until then, I'm the Absurd Word Nerd, and I hope this helps to disabuse you of your misbeliefs...

Outbreak Diary - Day 018

I'll be the first to tell you that morality is, by definition, subjective. A rock cannot be good or evil, because a rock is an object and has no will, it is amoral - and if a quality is reliant upon will and a thinking agent (a subject), it must be subjective. But, that doesn't change the fact that we can reach a general consensus, a kind of "agreed upon opinion" - this is essentially what people mean when they say common sense, they're referring to this vague, consensual group-opinion.
So, morality can seem objective, even though it isn't, because there are so few opponents of the group opinion, that they become "exceptions that prove the rule".

What the hell does this have to do with coronavirus? Well, a lot, as it turns out. Discussions of coronavirus talk about the curve - here in Australia we often talk about "flattening the curve". When people say that, they're referring to a graph representing the cases of coronavirus.
Now, it seems that the specific graph in question has changed, to "the curve of new cases of persons that are suffering from the virus", which has gone down. I blame journalists for changing the focus. Although the two tend to correlate, the graph for new cases changes more noticeably. It's harder to report on something slow and gradual and make it seem "immediate" and "exciting", so they switched to statistics that fluctuate more drastically. But, when we actually talk about the cumulative cases, we see exactly what people mean by "flattening the curve".

source: https://www.flattenthecurve.com/covid-19/

You have probably seen this online, or perhaps even on the news, as they talk about COVID-19. The idea is simple, that if we take measures to prevent the spread of this virus, then less people will become infected with the disease, but if we don't more people will be come infected. Therefore the curve in this graph becomes more flat.
Do you know what that sounds like to me? Because it has a familiar ring to it...
Have your heard of the Trolley Problem?

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem

Also known as the Train Problem, in the scenario, you are a man standing at the fork of the tracks of a railed vehicle (i.e. a train, tram, trolley, etc), which is currently headed for five people (i.e. rail workers, a passenger car, a lost family, etc.) who for some reason (i.e. a tunnel, deafness, speed of the vehicle, etc.) will be hit and killed by the train. You have the ability to switch the tracks, to another line, however there is a single person (i.e. a rail worker, a fat man, a deaf wanderer) on this track. The problem is thus: Would you take action, knowing one person will die, if through inaction five people will die?

The actual purpose of this ethical question is to determine schools of moral thought, specifically Deontology and Utilitarianism. I won't go into great detail, and this is a little simplified, but generally deontology is reliant upon choice and motive, specifically the value of a subject's actions (i.e. the act itself is judged); whereas utilitarianism is more concerned with utility and benefit, specifically the result of a subject's actions (i.e. the consequences are judged).
The argument is simple, that premature death is not good, therefore the act of killing is categorically wrong (so the act itself has no moral value) therefore taking an act that results in a death is wrong - therefore, you must not switch the lever.
However, if premature death is immoral, then a result that leads to five premature deaths, as opposed to one, should be considered five-times worse (so a result of five deaths has less moral value than a result of one death) therefore taking no action that results in five deaths is wrong - therefore, you must switch the lever.

Now, let's look at Coronavirus, because moral philosophy can give you a stomach ache if you look at it too long...

We have a situation which is remarkably similar. This is a naturally-occuring virus, no one is the cause (not even a runaway train) and it will result in the random deaths of a great many people, if allowed to spread freely through the world's population. If we did nothing, then many people would die, but they would die because of something in nature - insurance companies and gullible people might call it an Act of God, but either way it is an act of nature, no one is to blame.
However, if we choose to act, we willingly put a great many people out of work and alter the freedoms everyone takes for granted, and we know that many people will die nonetheless, but we know for a fact that the resultant deaths will be a much greater deal less.

Now, I don't know if it is five times less. From what I've seen, it's probably a lot higher than that (and we're talking orders of magnitude), but this crisis isn't over yet, so we won't know the consequences until much later.
But, nonetheless, it seems to quite easily prove my point, that despite there being several schools of thought, Kantian ethics and the categorical imperative has been utterly pulverized by utilitarian thought. We're taking a deliberate, harmful action - which indirectly leads to a portion of people dying, and directly leads to financial, cultural & social hardship. Yet, not only have many people embraced it, but some governments have been criticized for not embracing it fully, properly, or quick enough.


There is one small snag in this comparison, however... and that is the switch. See, the switch in the trolley problem is binary (on or off). This is a hypothetical question, but even if you could attempt to hold the lever in the middle, no man's hands are strong enough to derail a train, tram or trolley, so the train will follow a path nonetheless.
But, with coronavirus, there is actually a spectrum of possibilities to choose from- the downside being that through our actions, we are effectively choosing how many people we would like to die, instead of all.
If we had taken no action, approximately 60% of people could become infected, approximately 4% of which will die (approx. 168,000,000 people [168 million]).

[Author's Note: These are generous estimates, as currently, 0.02% of the world is infected, 5.8% of which have died (approximately 88,500 recorded deaths, at time of writing).]

Now, I am no mathematician or statistician, so if someone has better numbers than me, let me know. But, based off of projected "peaks" for coronavirus cases, and assuming a decline in cases that reflects it, we're looking at...
Current best case scenario is, approximately 0.1% of people become infected, approximately 4% of which will die (approx. 280,000 people [280 thousand]).

So, our switch isn't binary, there's not two choices "do or do not". There are over 160 million potential outcomes. Through every action we take or do not take regarding the spread of this virus, we are making a choice of how many more people, than ~280,000 deaths will occur.
With that in mind, I hope all of you stay home for Easter... I'm not exactly a fan of dying, but 280,000 deaths is enough in my opinion. What do you think? The choice is yours.

I'm the Absurd Word Nerd, and I have been hearing a lot of conspiracy theories regarding coronavirus lately, so I'm going to see what I can learn about these. Until Next Time, stay home, stay safe and enjoy your domestic Easter festivities.

Outbreak Diary - Day 013

As a writer, and hospitality worker, I have used Job Service Providers and Centrelink quite a few times in my life. I'm sure a lot more people are beginning to learn just how convoluted, bureaucratic and frustrating working with a government facility can be. Now, I do not blame the staff, because often they are just as frustrated with the system as we are - and with rare exception, they're all doing the best they can.

My favourite example of this happened a long time ago. I cannot remember the reason why, but I was asking for clarification about an issue (I think I had been told I had reported when I actually hadn't, or something like that).
I was talking to one of the service centre staff, and I said to him "I'm sorry, but I don't understand how this makes sense". He chuckled, and said to me:
"Well, that's your first problem. You're looking at this logically, but this is the Government we're talking about."
That man did go on to help me, and he did very effectively - by ignoring the reality, and telling the system what it expected to hear, I fixed the problem. That's always stuck with me, not only because it shows that some of the staff find this system as laughable as I do, but also because it helped me understand. So, to anyone frustrated with these JobSeeker/JobKeeper Allowances, I hope that helps you understand a little better and empathize with the staff working there - but, I'm not actually here to talk about Centrelink today.

I want to talk a little about contradiction, because it's something I'm seeing lately. Partially from the government - at least I thought so - but, mostly from the news. The government I can cover quickly, because there's less to this story than I thought.

Holy Days & Church as a Service

To begin with, Easter Holidays started yesterday here in Queensland. It started a little earlier in some other states, for no reason I can see except some attempt to close schools despite a national declaration to keep them open, but that's not what's important. What's important is that Easter Sunday is over a week from now, April 12th (2020).

In response, we were told that churches were having their restrictions relaxed, during Easter, so that churches could hold Easter services. To me, that's a pretty disgusting and despicable act - not only allowing people to congregate en masse during a crisis, but also allowing Churches to do so on Easter, even though Rama Navami the birth of a Hindu god, was on April 2nd (2 days ago); Jewish Passover is four days from now on April 8th; the Theravda New Year is April 9th for Buddhists; April 18th is the birthday of a Sikh guru Angad Dev & Ramadan begins over a week from now, on April 22nd - only the Christians get their holidays recognized?
Sure, I had to look up the dates for those days, I don't even know how they celebrate/commemorate/mourn these days because I don't care about any religious celebration, but I do care about equality and secularism, and a secular country giving any religion special treatment makes me sick to my stomach.

Now, before you worry too much, I looked into it and the Prime Minister clarified his statement recently - churches will not be open over Easter. You still cannot go to church, or any place of worship. The restriction being relaxed is that they will be considered places of business, meaning that churches holding online services can operate like a business, allowing a limited number of people to assist in the operation of their service.
I still don't appreciate that, as churches are not an essential service, and I feel that this should extend to all holidays, and not simply Judeo-Christian ones, but knowing that churches are still closed, and not filling pews with parishioners so as to spread this virus, I am less perturbed than I was when I first heard this story.

So, we're a secular country that reveres one religion over another - contradiction.

The Facemask Question

The second thing that comes to mind is the issue regarding facemasks. Before this virus came to our shores, but just after the virus was discovered in China, people were discussing whether it was appropriate for sick people to wear masks, like many do in Asia. Now, many of our experts came and explained, no, you don't need a mask - social distancing and washing your hands is more effective.

Come to today, where now over a million people have been confirmed to have contracted the virus, and America especially is saturated with cases, so Americans have been advised that they should wear facemasks to avoid spreading the virus (especially in and around New York), and in response now some Australian commentators have brought the question up again. Should we wear facemasks? Will it stop the spread? Why is everyone getting conflicting information?

Before I do, let's talk about Asia for a moment. The reason why Asians - by which I mean the Chinese, Japanese, Korean & Thai peoples - wear surgical masks is, in truth, more superstition than safety (and maybe even a kind of cultural fashion statement). Now, I am not some expert on Asian culture, a lot of what I know comes from a Quartz article by Jeff Yang, you can read that if you like, but in short, a long history of air pollution, and an even longer history of Chinese Folklore including air as a spiritual element (qi), and breathing in regards to meditation and cleanliness moreso than oxygen has lead to peoples around that part of the world to want to filter the air they breath in.
Now, whilst I'm no Asian culture expert, I do know a little about virology and air flow. The first thing you should know is that although coronavirus has a particularly long incubation period, just about every virus has "an incubation period", a brief search tells me it can vary from a day to a year, but all viruses can sit in your body for a while before they are noticed.

Think of it like termites. How often do you see a termite walk into your house? I'm pretty sure that you don't, but it must happen - unless a house is built with termites in the beams, termites must walk into your house at some point, or crawl into your walls. But you don't notice them come in, you only notice once the house starts falling apart, or when you go to clean behind the bookshelf and find a hole.

Your body works the same way - it can't tell when the virus comes in, it only notices when something starts to go wrong, or it bumps into it while doing something routine - it takes a while to tell if someone is sick, you have to wait until you can see symptoms. But, when a person is symptomatic, that's when a sick person is at their least infectious, because they're fighting the virus, killing it off. Sure, they may still get you sick if they sneeze on you, but I wouldn't even want a healthy person sneezing on me, since that's rude and gross.
You may see someone come into the office, coughing on Monday, and say "Keep away from me, I don't want to get sick," then on Friday, you get sick anyway, and think "Damn it, I TOLD them to stay away from me."
The fact is, 99 times out of 100, you didn't catch the virus from them on Monday, you probably caught it from them last week, back when they were infectious, and neither of you knew, so you weren't keeping distant. (This is why, the incubation period is known as the "infectious period" in some circles, although that's only in the case of viruses that spread by breath or skin contact).
This is the reason why social distancing is enforced even if you're "not sick". But, it's also the reason why only "sick" people wearing masks doesn't stop anything, because not all sick people are "sick" until it's too late.

But, what about the American/Asian option? They're wearing masks 24/7, that eliminates that infectious/incubation period if we all wear them all the time, doesn't it?
Well, that's the second issue - facemasks don't stop the spread of viruses.
They can mitigate the spread a little, if used properly, and some facemasks do exist which can prevent any viral infection from getting into or out of your mouth, but these facemasks all have one thing in common - they have an air-filter. The majority of the masks being spread around, especially around Asia, are surgical masks - believe it or not, surgical masks are for the doctor's benefit more than the patient's. Yes, it does prevent them from coughing or spitting onto the patient, but they're designed to stop blood, bodily fluids and viscera from the patient getting into the surgeon's mouth due to an accidental splash, or a cut vein, or one of the many other traumatic, but careful and curative acts of surgery. It's not to stop your breath or vapor droplets - in fact it can't, because the sides of the mask are often left unsecured so that the air the surgeon breaths can get in and out easily.
You're meant to afix the sides of the mask securely around your face, but most people don't bother with the necessary steps of putting on a disposable mask - as outlined by the World Health Organization, because they're not well-designed to fit every face. If you check out that advice, you will notice something as well - these masks are dirty, and in fact can make you sick, if used incorrectly. Once you've worn it for a while, or sneezed or coughed even once, then you will have a warm, slightly moist piece of cloth on your face, which means that it is at a high risk of becoming infectious, which is why you cannot touch a mask that you're wearing. In fact, before use, you should wash/sanitize your hands and afix the mask, and you should replace the mask once it is damp being sure to wash your hands afterwards, so as to not become infected by the soiled mask.
See, using a mask like this is like using a tissue - you use it once, and get rid of it. Leaving it on your face all day is just unsanitary, and can make you sick. It's not a perfect shield that keeps you safe.

Well, what about the air-filtered masks, then? The issue with those is, they are expensive - too expensive to have one for every citizen of an infected community. And even they aren't foolproof - as I said, masks become secure when you afix them to your face so that there are no gaps - meaning that a man with a five-o'clock shadow isn't protected. But, for these masks, and in fact every mask, the reason why we don't spread these amongst people is because essential workers need them. A mask that you're wearing because you are worried that you might get sick by coming near an infected person is a mask that a nurse can't wear, when they will come in contact with an infected person in their care - or its a mask that a family member can't wear when they have to isolate in their home with their children.

But let's set all of that aside for a moment. Maybe you don't care about the world at large - or maybe you care, but you still want to have a mask, or as I call it, "the jetpack argument" - I don't care that jetpacks are expensive and most people can't have them, because I still want one for myself.
Okay, fair enough, let's say that you can afford a proper face-mask with a filter or a respirator, and you plan to use it properly, and you want to wear it to feel safe.
Well, the problem with that is in the very words itself... it makes you feel safe.
The fact of the matter is, you're not safe even if you wear an effective, anti-viral facemask, because breathing in droplets isn't the only way that this virus spreads. It can infect people by coming into contact with food we ingest, or by spreading into the immune system weak-points of our eyes and nose, when we touch our face. Yes, a mask will make you feel safe, but it is a false sense of security.
The fact of the matter is that, except in cases where people cough or sneeze, the vapour droplets breathed by infected people don't travel very far, and tend to fall quickly to the ground or onto surrounding surfaces. Considering that, at time of writing, the rate of cases of COVID-19 infections has reached over 1 million people, it seems unlikely that most of those people happened to breathe in the droplets from someone else's mouth... I admit that that is speculation, but there is evidence to show that this virus can survive outside the body on non-porous surfaces for up to 3 days. And people are more careless when given a false sense of security.

So, why all this nonsense around America? Are they just stupid?
Well, no, not at all. They're actually following the advice perfectly. If you go back to that page from the World Health Organization, then you will see that they recommend you wear the mask (properly) for 1 of 2 reasons:
1. If you are sick, so as not to infect others,
2. If you are interacting with a sick person, so as not to infect yourself.
In America... especially around New York where they are propagating this advice, a lot of people are sick - we're talking hundreds of thousands - so, people in America are interacting with sick people, all the time. Their circumstances are different than here in Australia. Plus... although I meant everything I said about the false sense of security, and the ineffectiveness of the mask, maybe it's simply a gesture to show that they're doing what they can. Maybe it's false hope, but also maybe false hope is what America needs right now, to get them through until some real hope arrives.

Heck, maybe that's also the reason why the Prime Minister is giving churches more freedom to celebrate Easter...
I still don't like it, because it doesn't make any sense to me and it seems unfair, but at least I understand it a little better.


Anyway, that's what's happening around here lately. I'm the Absurd Word Nerd, unmasking the truth wherever it hides. Until Next Time, I've been pondering some of the moral, philosophical aspects of this coronavirus, and a fascinating juxtaposition that I'm surprised that no one has made yet... but, we'll talk about that another day.

Outbreak Diary - Day 006

As this blog says, I am an Absurd Word Nerd, and whilst I am a bit of a stickler for language being used concisely and to avoid misunderstanding, I do appreciate a good pun, so I'm enjoying some of the new terms coming out of this pandemic.
If you're scared of becoming coronic¹ in the wake of the rona², you may well be coronaphobic³. But whether you're scared, or fearless, don't be a covidiot⁴; because there is a coronacopia⁵ of ways to catch Trump Flu⁶, and we're all in this together... facing the coronapocalypse⁷.

¹ Coronic (src) adj. To have contracted coronavirus.
² the Rona (src) n. (slang) Shorthand for "the coronavirus".
³ Coronaphobia (src) n. The generalized fear of catching the current strain (COVID-19 in March 2020) of human coronavirus.
⁴ Covidiot (src) n. A person ignoring public health warnings regarding COVID-19 , or hoarding goods, denying them from their neighbours.
⁵ Coronacopia (src) n. (informal) a place which has a plethora of ways to spread the coronavirus infection.
⁶ Trump Flu (src) n. 1. A communicable disease, often with flu-like symptoms, which puts careless, unisolated, old, overweight & unhealthy persons (i.e. persons much like Donald J. Trump) at high risk of infection and death. 2. (informal) COVID-19.
⁷ Coronapocalypse (src) n. The apocalypse, specifically as caused by coronavirus.

Hey, you have to find ways to have fun during this pandemic, and ways to refer to new concepts, such as idiots ignoring the rules... it's unfortunate that we've had so many of these people that we're labelling them, but covidiot is definitely the term amongst these which has spread the farthest into the community at large.

People can be quite ignorant of the severity of this spread - but thankfully not all of them are "covidiots". There are some people that simply don't know, or maybe they don't understand, how or why things are the way they are. And if I'm honest, I don't blame them - the Australian Government has been scrambling to try to put the genie back into the bottle on this one, since they implemented public health guidelines too late, and as a result it seems like we're getting daily updates on new things that are closing, new restrictions in place and contradictory policies. And since the main concern is simply shutting them down, rather than explaining why these ones are being shut down, yet others remain open, it can sometimes seem like they're being picked at random. So, let's lay this all out so it's clear and easy to understand.

So, what is and isn't closed, and Why?

Let's start with the most comprehensive list of "which businesses are shut and locked down, which aren't, and which are in between" that I can manage. So, at time of writing (27th March, 2020):

Arts Venues (such as Art Galleries, Historic Sites, Museums & Public Libraries); Community Services (such as Community Centres & Youth Centres); Entertainment Venues (such as Amusement Parks, Arcades, Casinos, Cinemas, Gambling/Gaming Venues & Night Clubs); Beauty Therapy (such as Nail Salons, Piercing Salons, Tanning Salons & Tattoo Parlours); Licensed Venues (such as Bars, Clubs & Pubs); Indoor Sport Venues (such as Boot Camps, Gyms, Enclosed Courts/Fields, Fitness centres, Sport Stadiums & Yoga Studios); Play Venues (such as Community Pools, Play Areas, Playgrounds [Indoor & Outdoor] & Children's Entertainment); Sex Work Venues (such as Brothels & Strip Clubs) & Wellness Centres (such as Bathhouses, Massage Parlours, Saunas & Spas) - are CLOSED, no exceptions. They must close their doors, and not offer any goods or services until restrictions are lifted.

Accomodation Services (such as Bed & Breakfast, Boarding Houses, Campsites, Caravan Parks, Hotels & Motels); Barbershops (such as Hairdressers & Hairstylists); Hospitality Venues (such as Bistros, Cafés, Food Courts & Restaurants); Performance Venues (such as Arenas, Auditoriums, Concert Halls & Stadiums); Real Estate Services (especially Auction houses & Open houses); Religious Gatherings (such as Church services, Funereal Services & Weddings) & Travel Services (such as Airports, Cruise Terminals, Docks & Train Stations) - are RESTRICTED in their operations, but may remain open. They must either offer goods via delivery, drive-thru or take-away; offer services with limited capacity such as specific limits on the customers/attendees or they can only offer their services strictly via telephone or online.

Community Aid (such as Food Banks & Homeless Shelters); Education Services (such as Boarding Schools, Early Childcare Facilities, Primary School & Highschool); Essential Retail Services (such as Bottle Shops, Grocery Stores & Petrol Stations); Essential Healthcare Services (such as General Practitioners; Hospitals & Pharmacies) - are OPEN, with no specific qualifications (as yet). They still must observe social distancing & health guidelines wherever possible, of course.

Okay, so, why are these restrictions in place? Why are people banned from getting a haircut, but not a bottle of wine? How come I can't travel to foreign countries, but foreigners can come here? And most importantly, how come we've shut down places where adults gather, but not schools, with hundreds of kids in one place?

Well, let me introduce you to something known as Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs...
The concept is simple, we all have things we want, but there are some things we need. You may want to have friends, we all do - in fact, it's necessary for mental health in social creatures like humans. But, if someone grabs your throat and starts strangling you, as important as friendship is, it's much more important to get air into your lungs. So, the hierarchy is organized like so, with the least-important necessities at the top, but the most vital of needs at the bottom:

Self-Actualization
Achieving Personal Goals
Self-Esteem
Maintaining the Ego & Emotional Health
Social Belonging 
Being an Integral Part of a Society or Social Community
Safety
Keeping Comfortably Distant from Harmful Persons, Objects, Situations or Ideas.
Physiological Needs
Things that help you survive: Breathing, Drinking, Eating, Sleeping; Staying Clothed & Sheltered.

Believe it or not but, for the most part, the reason why some things are closed and some things are open seems to align pretty well alongside this hierarchy of needs. Now, this pandemic involves a virus that causes serious harm and even death, it threatens our Safety, and it spreads from person to person, by touch or close proximity, this means that if you look at this hierarchy now, everything involving "Social Belonging", and above is considered in the Red, it's not only less important in the hierarchy, but often holds potential risk. Only Safety & Physiological Needs are in the Green.

That doesn't mean that you don't need to achieve your goals, or be a part of the community - but we're currently being strangled by this virus, we're gasping for air, so we need to focus on Safety first.

Everything, every single thing on the "CLOSED" list has clear safety concerns. They either require bodily contact or close proximity, foster large crowds or they take place in a high-touch environment (which is to say, a place where several people are required to handle the same products or touch the same surfaces), which means they put people at risk.
So, Arts Venues, Community Centres, Entertainment Venues, Licensed Venues & Play Venues, are shut because of the crowds, keeping distance is difficult, and since they're not vital, they close.
Beauty Therapy, Indoor Sports Venues, Sex Work Venues & Wellness Centres are shut because they are high-touch venues (gym, spa and sports equipment changes hands a lot), or they require direct bodily contact (such as with massage & prostitution), and since they're not vital, they close.

Things on the "RESTRICTED" list, they tend to have safety concerns, but they either serve some vital role in our safety or physiological health, or all risk can be removed with simple restrictons.
Performance Venues, Real Estate, Religious Gatherings & Travel Services all have crowds - however, if you restrict the crowds (as has been done), or only allow online services, such as online performances, auctions and religious observances, then all risk is eliminated. Except perhaps for Travel Services, since there's still a risk if foreign people enter the country when coming from places with a high community infection rate, and that concerns me, but there are plans to limit that kind of travel. (Author's Note: Keep an eye on this one though, this is just my opinion but there still seems to be a lot of traffic going in and out of Australia, for all of it to be "essential".)
Accomodation Services; Barbershops & Hospitality Venues all provide necessities, since food, shelter and health is important - and don't worry, I'll explain barbershops. Now, although most people can buy groceries, if you are, say, a doctor or a nurse, you may be too tired or busy to cook your own dinner or make your own breakfast, especially if you live alone or - as this crisis often calls for - have a demanding and tiring job. Also, accomodation services are merely allowing current and permanent residents to stay, but not admitting new or temporary tenants.
Now, Barbershops... this one seems weird, and I admit that it is probably the odd-one-out. But, I believe the reason why they have an exception is because having long hair can not only get in the way for some jobs (think how nurses and food workers often need hairnets), but since hair has natural oils on it, viruses can stick to it. Most importantly, although the majority of people can probably cut their own hair, the elderly & many people with mental or physical disabilities either cannot, or can't do so safely. (Author's Note: Personally, I feel like there are other workarounds for this - why not have specialist hair-dressers do at-home visits for those in need, and for everyone else, give them hair-cutting tutorial? Honestly, I don't know. So, unless there is some other vital need for haircuts that I'm missing, this is the only reason I can see.)

Now, the 'OPEN' list. These are things which are essential, or which pose a greater risk if they are shut down.
Community Aid & Essential Healthcare Services, as well as Grocery Stores specifically - these keep people alive. Grocery Stores, Food Banks & Homeless shelters, duh, provide Food & Shelter to those in need; and obviously healthcare services are caring for those who are infected, as well as people who need urgent care.
Essential Retail Services, such as Bottle Shops and Petrol Stations, well, petrol stations are obvious, if you close them then people can't refuel, and since town-planning assumes the ability to travel by road, that would make travel impossible. Not to mention, if you travel by car, you're in an enclosed space, so it's less risky (from a virologists point of view) to drive to work than to walk. But, why Bottle Shops? Well, the sad fact of the matter is that according to some statistics, 1 in every 5 Australians are responsible for 75% of the nation's alcohol consumption, and at least one million people reported an average of EIGHT (8) standard drinks on a daily basis. We have shut down all the licensed venues where people can get a drink in public, but we don't know what would happen if we suddenly forced approximately 5 million alcoholics to go cold-turkey overnight, so bottle shops remaining open is simply a safety issue. We can't risk the fall-out of taking away their vice, so rather than having people drunk on the street, we're having them drunk at home.

Now, lastly, and finally... Education Services. Why are the schools open?
There is clearly a risk of crowding - classrooms have an average of 25 students often sitting side-by-side at desks, not to mention when they play on the playground together. And, children aren't responsible enough to maintain social distancing rules, or wash their hands. So, aren't they at serious risk at school?

No. Kids aren't at serious risk. I wouldn't say they're "safe", because as far as we can tell no one is immune to this virus, so no one is safe from it, but they're not at greater risk at school - and there is some risk when you keep them home. To understand why, there are four things you need to understand.

1. School-Aged Children are at the Lowest Risk from COVID-19

I want to show you a graph, and this graph comes from the the Australian Government's Department of Health Website. The link to the website should have an updated graph, but the image presented below was last updated 26/03/2020, the day before yesterday, at time of writing:

These are all of the Confirmed Cases of People that are Infected with COVID-19 in Australia, Sorted by Age and Separated by Sex. These aren't all the dead people, this are just the total number of people with the disease. Now, one of the first thing's you may notice is that 20-something women are high risk, I'm not sure why, but it's an interesting datum.
But, the other thing you will notice is that the bulk of the numbers in this graph consist of people aged twenty to seventy-nine. Considering that Elderly people are in the high-risk category, we get to give ourselves a pat on the back for our luck and/or effort that has kept them healthy - since they are still the highest fatality rate worldwide. But there are less than 25 cases of children aged 9 or less getting sick, and less than 100 cases of kids as old as 19.

Now, what about deaths? Well, as I said in a previous post, there have been NO FATALITIES for children aged 9 and under worldwide, let alone Australia. And As for 10-19? Well, it's hard to get exact numbers - but from what I can tell, there have been 2 worldwide (1 in the U.S. & 1 in Spain), but none in Australia. Don't get me wrong, the death of any person is a tragedy, especially someone so young, and I don't want to pretend like these deaths don't matter, because they do.
But, that being said, we're talking 2 in the whole world, and both from areas with high infection rates. Plus, although there is no data to determine whether these victims had pre-existing conditions or weakened immune systems, there is also no evidence to the contrary, so the possiblity that they were higher-risk still remains.
So, as it stands, schoolchildren have the lowest risk of contracting this disease, and then the lowest risk of dying from it, if they get sick.

2. If a Child is at School, they aren't in the Community

Children are, in general, irresponsible. They usually don't wash their hands properly, they often don't do as they're told, they aren't well-educated (yet), they are easily distracted, they often put things in their mouth, I've never seen a schoolkid under the age of 10 cover their mouth when they cough or sneeze & they fall over and hurt themselves a lot.
So, doesn't it therefore make sense to send them to school, where teachers have years of experience dealing with them and keeping them busy, than to have them out in the community at large? As I said prior, schoolchildren are the least likely to get sick - so, doesn't it make sense to let them all bounce around and against each other, than it is to send them into the community, to bump into someone who has a higher likelihood of getting them sick in the first place, or more likely transferring that sickness around to others?

If schoolchildren are at school, it reduces their risk of getting sick, but more importantly the risk of everyone around them, since our risk is higher than theirs. Now, you might think "well, why not just lock schoolchildren inside, and not let them out?"
A couple of things. Firstly, if you're not at home with them, then that may very well be illegal, falling under "supervisory neglect", which is when a child is left unsupervised for an unreasonable amount of time (Author's Note: The Law is deliberately vague on what constitutes "an unreasonable amount of time", as it depends on the age of the child, the circumstances they're left in and the provisions made for their care). Secondly, schoolchildren need to be able to get out and play and keep their minds busy, because keeping young schoolkids locked up inside isn't good for their development - they need supervision. Even if a lack of supervision doesn't put them at danger, it still puts them at a severe disadvantage. Schoolkids need to be supervised.

3. Some Children Can't Stay at Home

Maybe some parents can stay home and supervise their children, and if you are at home, as a family, then this is a good opportunity to spend time together. However, not everyone can do that. If you have a job, you need to keep that job, so you can't take time off work to take care of your children that are suddenly at home 24/7. In some households, both parents work, or one of the parents works nightshift and sleeps daily, or one parent has a disability, or it's a single-parent houeshold, or one of the family members is self-isolating or a member of the family is stuck overseas, outside of our borders - there are millions of people in this country, and everyone has their own story, and not every story is as simple as "well, I'll just quit my job and take care of the kids, and everything will be fine."
The fact of the matter is that there are a whole lot of nurses, doctors, grocers, politicians & researchers who cannot take care of their children at home right now - and simply asking thousands and thousands of people to hire a babysitter or a tutor not only isn't something they can afford (and bringing in grandparents to babysit just puts them at risk), and even if they could, it would violate social distancing and social isolation, putting the children and the sitter/tutor at risk.

There's also suggestions of having distance-schooling, and that does seem like a viable option for some people, by having schoolchildren learn stuff online. But the problem with that is not only do some schoolchildren have a harder time learning without one-on-one support, but there are a whole lot of people who don't have access to the internet. I know that seems crazy in this day and age, but we're talking about the entirety of Australia. Like I said,

4. When it comes to Educating Children, Timing is Critical

A school is not simply a babysitting service. it may seem like it from the outside, but even early childcare and kindergarten is for social development, and is vital for a child to develop necessary skills and habits. I struggle to explain how important schooling is because, to me, it's self-evident. Young schoolchildren learn how to speak, read, write, follow tasks, use problem solving, play and socialize but also learn the importance of separating work time from play time & they learn more and more about this amazing world we live in, which you and I get to take for granted because we've already been to school and we know all this cool stuff already. Then for older students, it teaches how to work together, it teaches critical thinking skills, responsibility, time management, setting and accomplishing goals.
And the reason I'm listing all of this stuff, even though I think it's obvious, is because if you don't teach children this stuff now, you might never be able to.
This is a concept in biology known as a Critical Period, which states that as you mature, there are specific spans of time in which your nervous system becomes more sensitive to environmental stimuli, meaning that if you aren't exposed to such stimuli, then it may become difficult - even impossible - to learn certain tasks or skills. Basically, as a child, your brain is growing, and growing, and it's able to stretch and warp and bend - like warm plastic, hence why this concept is called "neuroplasticity" - this means that children can learn new ideas, new concepts and create the connections in their brain necessary for the understanding of those ideas. But, as you get older, that neuroplasticity starts to solidify. You can still learn, but it's a lot harder to learn, because instead of your brain growing whole new connections, instead it has to rely on the old connections, meaning that you can only understand concepts if it aligns with the ideas you already have.
I am no neurologist, so I believe you can still create some new connections in your brain - but it's a lot harder to do, and you're actually more likely to lose old, unused connections than to gain newer ones.
So, as far as I'm concerned, taking children out of school is a very dangerous game, not only for everyone in the community now, but also for their future.


Now, don't get me wrong, I don't think this is a simple issue, and "go to school and learn" or "stay at home, locked away" aren't the only two options. People have talked about having restricted schooling - only those who cannot keep kids at home can school them. Or, we can do what we're essentially doing now, having people take their children out of school if they can afford to (although, for now, I do insist: please, send your kids to school so long as it's open, it really is the best thing for them, unless they're in the high-risk category). Also, children aren't the only issue - teachers go to schools as well, and have to interact with these kids, and if that's going to continue, then safety measures for those teachers need to be put in place.
I'm not telling you "these are the reasons why children MUST stay in school", these are simply the reasons why it's okay that schools are still open, why it's been legislated this way, and why I believe you should send your children to school, unless there are outstanding circumstances.

I'm the Absurd Word Nerd, and what do you think about all this? Are you for, or against, school closures? Let me know in the comments. Until Next Time, I'm going to go see if I can learn something new about this virus...

Outbreak Diary - Day 002

I want to start this on a lighter note, because this might get a bit serious. So, first... I went for a walk today, and I liked it. I needed the exercise, and it was good to see so many people keeping their distance. I assume the people walking side-by-side are either family or couples - I believe that is perfectly okay but if not, maybe keep that in mind.

But, one thing pissed me off... joggers. Not every jogger, some of you were nice. I know social distancing isn't meant to mean "be social", but I said hello to people anyway (I want people to know that I'm still personable even if I'm literally not approachable, and it seemed to make some people smile) and I don't mind that joggers don't say hello back - you pass more people, it probably would get annoying, and you are probably a little more out of breath, that's fine.

What's NOT fine, is when joggers put their earbuds in, try to ignore the world, and run right past people less than half-a-metre away. Not only is it incredibly rude to do that, but it's dangerous. I had TWO joggers do this to me. I recognize that many of the footpaths are about a metre wide, meaning that you'd have to step off the path to keep the 1.5-metre distance, but every other person managed to do that, so there is no excuse not to - it's not like the ground was slippery, and even if it was, you're allowed to stop jogging for 4 seconds, and walk around. Your jog isn't more important than public health, you miserable oxygen thief.
In fact, that's the most important part, as I also said above, you guys breathe heavily. I don't care if you think you've improved your cardio, because it's a scientific fact that when you burn energy the chemical reaction of the breakdown that turns stored fat or nutrients into energy, requires oxygen and creates carbon dioxide as a byproduct. This means that when you use more energy, such as when you jog, you need to breathe in more to help this chemical process, and you need to breathe out more to exhaust the waste products of this reaction.
So, when you jog that close, you're breathing all up on me and everyone else you slip past, with your potentially-infectious respiratory droplets, not to mention potentially your sweat. If you can't jog, and keep your distance from other people like a respectful human being, buy a treadmill. Or, just stay inside and stop offending people with your presence.

Fear and Loathing in BrisVegas

Perhaps, I am at a slight advantage to most.

Early in January, I lost my job because the charity I worked for closed its retail sector, meaning my job dissolved - so, when thousands and thousands of people lost their jobs, I was no worse off.
I am an ambivert, so whilst I can occasionally go out with a group of friends, I find a lot of comfort being on my own - so, when people were told to keep their distance from friends and socialize less, I was no worse off.
Although I don't consider myself rich, I don't have many expenses, and I live with family which is fairly well off (probably upper-middle class, socioeconomically) - so, when the economy hit its slump, I was no worse off.
Most of the things that I take comfort and joy in, are watching movies (particularly DVDs), reading books (I have hundreds), listening to music (alone) & writing, both fiction and online journals like this - so, when people we're told to stay indoors as much as possible, I was no worse off.
Heck, I might even be better off, since it gives me more of an excuse to write.

So, perhaps the reason why I am not as bothered by all of the COVID-19 restrictions and hardships is because I have the privilege of not suffering from them. The worst thing this virus has done for me is, firstly, it means it's harder to find a job (Author's Note: I am still looking. Is anyone out there looking for a writer, barista or retail manager? Anyone? Please...), and secondly, it means I can't go to the movies, and I was looking forward to seeing that Fantasy Island movie - but hell, unless movie studios like losing money, I'm sure they'll find some way to let people download movies for a fee at home, so even that second part, I'm not so bothered by.

The reason I mention all this is, I am not at all worried about the coronavirus.
Of course, I am concerned - everyone should be concerned, this isn't a picnic - but I'm not upset, perturbed or afraid of it. And that's the big one, fear.
Last night, I was watching the channel 9 "Coronavirus - The Latest" program, because I find it interesting, and like I said yesterday, it's good to stay informed. But not only were the hosts often saying that they were scared, and also that many viewers were scared and that we all need to stay calm; but, there was also this Channel 7 PSA which had all these celebrities, actors, journalists, sportsfolk and media personalities saying things like "these are scary times", "stay safe", "keep your spirits up", "you're not alone" and "we're all in this together", along with the hashtag #together.
I thought it was really cute, and a good idea for people who are worried, and so people can stick together and not feel isolated, even if they have self-isolated.

But, it occured to me, I thought it was cute, but there must be people out there who need it - I mean, are you scared? Genuinely, you reader, are you scared? That's not a rhetorical question, by all means respond in the comments below, because I can only speak for my own experiences, and in my experience, I merely feel "annoyed, but complacent" in regards to all this.
Let me be the first to say, you entirely have the right to be upset, and you have the right to be very concerned. People are losing their jobs, the economy is buggered, I'm sure there are people out there on the verge of homelessness or at high-risk and not able to follow all of the health and safety guidelines, and I know for a fact that there are some issues with getting certain specialist or overseas medicines and people are even talking about this being as impactful to the economy, society, politics, culture and art as WW2 or The Depression.

So, I'm not stupid, I understand that there is reason to be worried. But, once again, I may be in a place of advantage because, well, I suffer from chronic anxiety - so despite all this stress, I was no worse off.

I've talked about it on this blog before, but if you're only reading these Outbreak Diaries, let me tell you, I take medication to manage my anxiety, but most importantly for you readers, I've come to understand what anxiety really is, and what it means.
You see, there are two types of stressors for an anxious reaction. I am sure there's an official term in the psychological field, but these are what I call them:

Irrational Stressors - These are the type I ususally suffer from, when I overthink something, and build some fantastic situation where no matter what I do, I will fail - a good example is "I can't find my keys; I'll never find my keys; now I can't drive anywhere; I'm trapped at home alone; my life is at a standstill," - as you can see, irrational, it's making irrational, illogical leaps from one thought to the other. There are often simple, rational ways around it, but the stress makes you lose perspective, so you're unable to see how irrational these fears are.

Overreactive Stressors - These are the type which, from what I can tell, people who are scared about coronavirus are suffering. So, I don't need an example, because it's people looking at the situation, like this coronavirus and thinking "I've lost my job, or the economy is struggling; I don't know what the future will hold, as these are new and uncertain times; people will die, and if I am not careful I and/or my family are at risk" - as you can see, this is rational, since this fear is real. But, that doesn't change the fact that anxiety (in the chronic, mental illness sense), is still an overreaction. See, even though this stressor is real and present, the stress still makes you lose perspective, so you're unable to see how you can deal with these real and present dangers.

Think of it like... there is a landmine in your back yard, and you know about it. A landmine is dangerous and deadly, and can definitely kill, disable, debilitate or seriously harm anyone that gets too close. It would be irrational to ignore it, but it would be just as irrational to freak out, run around the house screaming "bomb, bomb, bomb, we're all going to die!", or sitting in the corner crying, or whatever exaggerated scene of worry you can think of.
Yes, the bomb is real, and that is a real and present obstacle - but if you worry and stress, now there's two obstacles, there's two bombs on your property, the real one, and the one in your head that's making you stress out.

So, even though this is a real stressor and not an imagined one, and you can't make it go away by breathing deep and meditating, it doesn't change the fact that if you let it get the better of you, then you can still overreact.
That's why we had people panic-buying toilet paper and canned food, they were freaking the hell out and overreacting to a danger, and actually making things worse; because the people who could buy 12 bags of toilet paper were really screwing over the people who could only buy 1, and now can't buy any.
That's why we have people claiming that China bio-engineered this virus, or people claiming that there's a secret vaccine in America or that this is all an elaborate Jewish hoax (yes, people really are blaming the Jews for this, bigots and conspiracy theorists are close bedfellows), it was because people are scared at the idea of random and unforeseen viruses mutating and killing thousands of people, so they wanted to know that someone was in control, that someone could have predicted this; but this made things worse because it was dividing people and dehumanizing, rather than concerning ourselves with how to stop the spread, and help the people who have already been infected.

This is not to say that you're not allowed to be anxious, or stressed. It's a healthy, rational and human response to this to feel a bit scared. I'm not better than you, or more logical/rational just because I am not worried - I just have more practice at dealing with stress, because I'm at a higher risk of my own anxiety. So, you can feel stressed, but if you are starting to feel depressed, frightened, or worst of all panicked, please sit down and take a deep, deep breath - deep into the bottom of your lungs, then breath out (just be aware, if you do this four or more times, you can feel lightheaded); and take a moment to not just notice, but fully realize and be conscious of where you are, live in the present moment and not your fears of the future, since worrying about the "could be" is a great way to ignore the "right now".
Right now, you're home, or reading this on your phone somewhere, most likely isolated from friends. Why not spend some time with family, call your mate, maybe give that facetime thing a go - call your grandparents, they're probably scared, and would like to catch up. Or, if you know anyone in isolation, or who is at high risk, give them a call. It's a fact that it's not only easier, but therapeutic, to help someone else that's stressed than it is to help yourself when stressed.
It's not about distracting yourself from the worry; because that's a bad habit, you should identify what worries you, but don't just think about it, talk about it and help each other. If you don't know the answer, then ask someone who might, don't just assume you're lost and alone. Or, if you don't want to talk about it, then don't mire in your own fears - get up and do something productive, even if that's just having a laugh, tidying or disinfecting your house, or playing a boardgame. Or, if you can manage to, why not look around to see if there's anyone around you that's struggling, and see if you can help (from a safe distance, of course).
There's a lot that you can do, but we're all blind to it if you're too busy worrying about the landmine to disarm it...

Anyway, that's all from me today, I hope it helps. I'm the Absurd Word Nerd, and until next time, if you're still feeling stressed please leave me a comment and I'll do my best to respond.